
There are constantly
news of
books being adapted for film, and
some are great ideas while others
make me wary. There are loads of bad adaptations (remember
Suburban Girl based on Melissa Bank's
The Girls' Guide to Hunting and Fishing? Yeah, most people don't.) and a few examples of the opposite (
The Jane Austen Book Club made for a better movie than book, in my opinion).

It's a strange experience when you realize you're enjoying a movie more than you enjoyed the book on which it's based because so often the opposite is true. After all, presumably an author has the advantage because he/she can provide deep insight into characters that actors have to convey with but a glance. Every so often, though, a story makes a lot more sense onscreen.

Since
we now have an outline of the main characters for the rumored
90210 spinoff, my brain can't stop thinking about who might be cast in these roles. While these new characters have updated traits and hobbies (emo! YouTube!) they are,
as some have pointed out, more or less the new versions of the original cast.

February is a big month here in entertainment-land, with both the
Grammy Awards and the
Oscars on the docket and this weekend's
Super Bowl unleashing a new crop of commercials (not to mention a new Paula Abdul song) on the world. But I have my eye on plenty of other things, too. Want to see what I've
got to have (and do, and see, and rent) this month?

I was totally right about
The Jane Austen Book Club: It makes a far better movie than it did
a book — though yes, I'm aware that Austen herself would blanch at my saying that about any written work. In this situation, however, we don't particularly need to know the inner workings of these characters' emotional lives. We don't need to read their thoughts.