For fans of Dr. Seuss's classic and dark children's book and 1972 made-for-TV movie The Lorax, you know the plot is a cautionary tale of protecting the environment and warning against greed. It's an important story both youngsters and adults can enjoy. But from the looks of the just-dropped The Lorax trailer (out next year), the new animated film adaptation is now about a boy impressing a girl. It's the girl (voiced by Taylor Swift) who wants to see a real tree now that they're no longer growing in the town, so the male protagonist goes to find one for her. If it was the girl who wanted to find the trees, why couldn't she have been the one to go on an adventure? And why is a story about the environment not good enough without a love story? Watch the trailer above for yourself, and tell me, do you think this new The Lorax will do the book justice?
Johnny Depp to Produce and Possibly Star in a Dr. Seuss Film!
- Johnny Depp to play Dr. Seuss? Get all the details — Hollywood Reporter
- Scarlett Johansson talks about aspiring for old Hollywood glamour — People
- Blake Lively has come out of her DiCaprio romance looking really, really awesome — Lainey Gossip
- Penn Badgley gets political and joins the Wall St. protests — Huffington Post
- Why did Jimmy Fallon douse Hugh Jackman in water? — The Daily Beast
- George Clooney says skinny dipping at his house is a tradition! — Us Weekly
- Nina Dobrev spills Vampire Diaries secrets! — TooFab
- Can Dolphin Tale hold on to the top box office spot? — Rotten Tomatoes
- Wedding bells for Drew Barrymore and Will Kopelman? — Wonderwall
- Arnold Schwarzenegger dedicates a museum to . . . himself — Lifeline Live
- Who was the latest person to storm off the Piers Morgan show? — Zap2It
- Why did Ryan Gosling bring his dog to a yoga class? — Celebitchy
- Johnny Depp to play Dr. Seuss? Get all the details — Hollywood Reporter
- Scarlett Johansson talks about aspiring for old Hollywood glamour — People
- Blake Lively has come out of her DiCaprio romance looking really, really awesome — Lainey Gossip
- Penn Badgley gets political and joins the Wall St. protests — Huffington Post
- Why did Jimmy Fallon douse Hugh Jackman in water? — The Daily Beast
- George Clooney says skinny dipping at his house is a tradition! — Us Weekly
- Nina Dobrev spills Vampire Diaries secrets! — TooFab
- Can Dolphin Tale hold on to the top box office spot? — Rotten Tomatoes
- Wedding bells for Drew Barrymore and Will Kopelman? — Wonderwall
- Arnold Schwarzenegger dedicates a museum to . . . himself — Lifeline Live
- Who was the latest person to storm off the Piers Morgan show? — Zap2It
- Why did Ryan Gosling bring his dog to a yoga class? — Celebitchy
The Lorax Will Be the Next Dr. Seuss Work to Hit Theaters
On March 2, 2012, a CG-animated version of Dr. Seuss's The Lorax will be coming at you in 3-D, courtesy of Universal Pictures and Illumination Entertainment. In an era when being "green" is chic, The Lorax may have particular relevance, as it follows the greedy Once-ler who strips a forest of its Truffula trees — despite warnings from the tree-loving Lorax — which only leaves him with a land devoid of animals.
Dr. Seuss's works have been fodder for a few movies in recent years, including the live-action How the Grinch Stole Christmas! and Cat in the Hat (after which Seuss's widow, Audrey Geisel, voiced her displeasure and refused to allow any more live-action adaptations), and the animated Horton Hears a Who.
I remember feeling anxious about Horton, as that book was so near and dear to me, but it ended up being completely delightful. I think The Lorax could look pretty cool up on the big screen as well. And though it's a classic work (and will therefore cause some people to be outraged about an adaptation), I still find it touching that Seuss's creations will continue to inspire more generations in new ways.
Horton Hears A Who: Sweet and Surreal Seuss

Turning a classic children's story into a mass-market, big-screen movie is always a risky proposition. So many never live up to the promise of the original — or, worse, change it into something unrecognizable. But luckily, Horton Hears A Who is on the other end of that spectrum. 20th Century Fox's animated adaptation balances Seuss's sweet story with stunning visuals, deftly sharing its message ("a person's a person, no matter how small") with only brief interludes of cheesiness.
In case you were more of a One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish fan, here's the story of Horton in a nutshell: In a magical jungle, there lives an elephant named Horton, who one day spots a little speck on a flower. Thanks to his big ears, he can hear the noises coming from the speck and finds a way to communicate with the Whos of Whoville, who have lived their entire lives unaware that their universe was nothing more than a precarious resting spot on a flower somewhere. Horton wants to get the Whos to a safe place, but the jungle's bossy kangaroo doesn't believe Horton (and certainly doesn't want all the other jungle creatures imagining there are worlds on their flowers, too) and tries to thwart his mission. Meanwhile, the Mayor of Whoville — the only person who can communicate with Horton — has some doubters of his own who want to make a fool of him for suggesting their universe is merely a speck. Will the two worlds ever find common ground? Well, it's Dr. Seuss, so I suppose it's no spoiler that the answer is yes — but the way it plays out on film is fun to watch, so read more
ABC Sitcom Gets New Name Because of Dr. Seuss
Recently, I was over on ABC's fall preview site, and I noticed that the logo for the network's new Christina Applegate comedy had changed:

"How clever!" I thought. "The show's about amnesia, so they're acting like they forgot its name!"
Not so. As it turns out, ABC no longer had a name for the series because the estate of Dr. Seuss was angry about the original title. See, "Sam I Am" drew on the first lines of Green Eggs and Ham, and apparently the Seuss folks didn't appreciate the allusion (or, as Variety speculated, they wanted too much money for its use).
So ABC is changing the title to "Samantha Be Good" — which I suppose should be lawsuit-free unless Samantha Bee decides to get involved.
