Ok, Dreamgirls didn't get nominated for Best Picture, and it really didn't deserve to be. Now, let's move on, shall we?
This year's Academy Award nominations run the gamut from painfully obviously (namely, the Best Actress and Supporting Actress categories) to totally — and thrillingly — up in the air. In fact, I can't remember a recent year when the Best Picture race was this tough to call. I have to say, I'm pretty impressed with the Academy's open-mindedness, and depending on how the winners shake out, the 2006 Oscars might just renew my faith in this ridiculous awards show.
But first, allow me to get a few things off my chest...
For once, I have an opinion about sound design, and it is apparently wrong
Pan's Labyrinth got a lot of love — including nominations for Best Foreign Film and Art Direction — but it was left out of the sound design and editing categories. Never before have I walked out of a movie and declared: "If that film doesn't win a sound Oscar, there is no god." Of course, I also know nothing about sound design.
The acting Nominations for The Departed are totally spot on.
I love it when the Academy recognizes scene-stealers over veterans, and Mark Wahlberg's performance really made this movie for me. Kudos to the Oscars for choosing Mark over Jack Nicholson being Jack again.
Yeah, maybe Leo deserved a nod for The Departed, but if he's even better in Blood Diamond, then it's silly to nominate him twice — especially when Forest Whitaker is probably going to win anyway.
Why does the Academy hate James Bond so much?
It's handing out technical awards left and right to the dreadful Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, while treating Casino Royale — with its astounding opening chase scene and crumbling Venetian building sequence — like an amateur entry.
For the rest of my rants, read more