With Halloween just around the corner, October is the perfect time for movie studios to unleash their creepiest films, since we're all in the mood for a good scare. Combine with that the insatiable desire for vampire entertainment, and you've got Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant; a tween fantasy movie that plays out like R.L. Stein's Goosebumps novels on the big screen — but not nearly as scary.

Based on the book series by Darren Shan, Cirque du Freak is the story of Darren (Chris Massoglia), your typical 16-year-old boy trying to quell his high school boredom. Dubbed "Mr. Perfect" by his mischievous best friend Steve, Darren follows the rules, has plenty of friends, and does whatever his parents tell him to do — that is, unless Steve can convince him otherwise. The boys pick up a flyer for the Cirque du Freak and decide to check it out.
That's just the beginning though, so to see what I thought of the film, just read more.
Things go awry when Darren finds himself tangled up in the world behind the Cirque, particularly that of Larten Crepsley, a crotchety vampire who couldn't be bothered with a teenager. When Darren gets himself into a sticky situation, the only way he can bail himself out is by selling his soul to Crepsley, becoming his half-vampire assistant.
If you thought sorting out all the vampire lore in Twilight and True Blood was confusing, get ready for the most convoluted yet. In this story, a war is brewing between two breeds: the Vampanese represent the blood-suckers that are all for killing their prey, while the run-of-the mill vamps prefer to sedate, feed, and then letting their victims return to regular life. As a half-vampire who's reluctant to lose what little human qualities he has left, Darren obviously joins Larten Crepsley's team, while his best friend Steve joins the evil Vampanese.

As for the actual Cirque du Freak, the group of misfits and outcasts are more X-Men and less Carnivale. The crew includes unusual children who were abandoned by their parents (like "Snake Boy" and "Monkey Girl"), along with a few other vaudeville acts like the Bearded Lady (Salma Hayek) and a woman who can regenerate her limbs (Jane Krakowski). Some are friendly, others are surly, but the cirque in itself is more campy than scary; little hideout is basically an island of misfit toys.
The film isn't boring, but it's not exactly packed with pizazz either. Director Paul Weitz was sure to stay on the safer side of the movie's PG-13 rating, rarely pushing the envelope on what could have been a much creepier film. John C. Reilly is always reliable for a good performance, and he has some great comedic timing as the voice of brutal honesty to Darren's naivete. Massoglia gives decent performance for a newbie, and even reminded me of a young Emile Hirsch at times. That said, the movie is also packed with confusing subplots and some truly corny dialogue that evoked collective groans from the audience.
If you're looking for a fun movie to get you into the Halloween spirit, this might do the trick. Just make sure you're in a tween state of mind.
Photos courtesy of Universal Pictures





















Temperley London
i'm so confused about this movie. i think the previews and ads have been awful...that said, i might check it out on dvd later, but i'm not spending $ at the theater
1I read the book many years ago and thought it was cute. It sounds like the movie is being aimed at the same audience the book was aimed at, which is kids, so I wouldn't expect it to be scary. It sounds like you had expectations that don't match the aim of the film/book.
2I read the series as well a few years ago, and the child that I read it to enjoyed it immensely. Based on the previews it looks like they went after the kids market rather than the Twilight Tween/Teen/Creepy Mom's market. I think it's a good idea to market to the kids that aren't old enough to get the whole Twilight Mania.
3I'm taking the kid I used to read to to see this movie later on today, and he's really excited about it.
Well for some people, smart movies will tend to be confusing, especially if you go into them with Twiglasses on.
4caterpillargirl, i meant that i'm confused about how this movie is being marketed. whoever was in charge of that did a really crappy job.
5I've never read the book but the previews make it look awful. I'll definitely be avoiding this one.
6blondie i meant buzz for that comment not you.
7I'm a middle school teacher and my students love this series! I've read the series as well and am disappointed to see how campy this film is appearing to be. The "freaks" in the book were much more "real"---not so much Xmen like, but more freaks that you could still believe. I just hope the movie succeeds in making the whole Mr. Crepsley situation much more logical than the previews make it seem.
8As a teenager who's read the books recently (I started the first book Monday and finished the third book Friday) I have to say that this movie should not even bare the name of the series. I understand condensing book-films but the movie was marketed to be based only on the first three books and it wasn't. Also the addition of monkey girl was a horrible choice as it changed most of the emotional backdrop of the story, the only character who even resembles the amazingly written characters of Darren Shan's work is Mr. Crepsley (John C. Reilly). As my friends and I, my friends also being huge fan of the books, watched this film we couldn't help but laugh at the poorly written transitions and poor acting of most of the cast members. The Cirque was too typical circus like and not truly as dark as described. I have to wonder if the writers even knew anything about the books (it really seems as if the only en wikapediaed the information on it). Really the romance was stupid, the acting was poor, and all-in-all the idiots tried to turn it into Twilight Jr. it's only saving grace is John C. Reilly. That's it point blank everything else about it sucked.
9I'm a real fan of the series and have been reading Darran's books since the age of 12, and I have just recently finished reading his latest series/book at 16. I have not seen the film yet but from what i saw, it's disgraceful. The actors (Sorry Reily) didn't resemble their characters at all from the trailer, and various scenes from the movie i've seen. It's been 'Americanised'. The whole, cheesy high-school look really gives off the wrong atmosphere for me. In addition, the plot - w t f! I can't imagine how Shan fans are going to enjoy the rest of the series *shivers* if they've screwed with it all too much all ready. But i have not seen the whole film yet and hopefully i shall stand corrected.
10This film does not do you justice master shan. x
No thanks. I don't think I want to see this one.
11Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.