In My Sister's Keeper, young Anna knows that she was genetically engineered and brought into this world in order to serve as a donor for her ailing sister, Kate. Well, My Sister's Keeper was engineered to make people cry — over and over and over again, for two hours. Anna sues her parents for medical emancipation, and by the end of this movie I wanted to file for emotional emancipation.

Anna (played sweetly by Abigail Breslin) was conceived after her parents, Sara (Cameron Diaz) and Brian (Jason Patric), learned that their young daughter Kate (the teenage version played by Sofia Vassilieva) had leukemia and their other child, Jesse (Evan Ellingson), was not a perfect match to be a donor for his sister. Throughout her life Anna has been required to give all sorts of things from her body to help keep Kate alive and now, at the age of 11, Anna finds a lawyer (Alec Baldwin) to sue her parents for medical emancipation. The lawsuit comes at a critical time: Kate's kidneys are failing, and without one of Anna's kidneys, Kate will die — soon. The story unfolds in a series of flashbacks that fill in some blanks about the family's journey up until this point. The flashbacks are interspersed with scenes of the present-day situation as Kate's condition worsens and Sara, a former lawyer, prepares to fight her youngest daughter in court. For more on this terribly sad movie, read more.
This drama is, of course, very moving. It centers around a kid with cancer! Of course there's inherent sadness just within that plot, and essentially, nothing more is really needed to make most people feel. But My Sister's Keeper takes this story and milks it for all its worth, stretching out heart-wrenching scene after heart-wrenching scene. I don't fault the movie for being sad, and I don't even think it's that poorly done, but it could have benefited greatly from some strong editing. Despite trying to cover a lot of ground in a relatively short period of time (we hear perspectives from each character — including quite a bit from Kate herself), the movie drags on languorously in many parts, and I just wanted to yell at the screen that we get it. It's sad. We're crying. There's so much more to this story, please move on!

At first, it takes a little while to warm up to these people — particularly so with Diaz's Sara, not because her character is a tough cookie but because Diaz is so shrill at times it's hard to take her seriously. I wondered if this role was too heavy for her to handle; there's just something insubstantial about the way she portrays Sara. It doesn't ruin the movie, but I still wish they'd cast someone else in that role. Sofia Vassilieva's performance as Kate is well done and requires a delicate touch that Vassilieva capably displays — she's sympathetic as a cancer patient, of course, but she also convincingly plays another side of Kate: a giggly, sometimes insecure teenage girl who wants to date boys and look pretty.
I knew going into this that my emotions would be manipulated, and they really do pull out all the stops — including the use of a heartbreaking song every eight minutes or so (like Greg Laswell's slow, haunting version of "Girls Just Want to Have Fun"). But even with all the music and all the horrors of cancer, by the end of the film, the sweet and complex bonds between these parents and these siblings are what deliver the gut-punch that forces the tears to start flowing.
Photo courtesy of Warner Bros.




















Levi's
I really want to watch this movie, it looks great! I think I am seeing it tommorow.
1i would never watch this in a theater... bc i know full well that i'd bawl my eyes out and leaving a theater with smeared mascara, a red nose and blood shot eyes isn't really what i was going for. haha.
definitely one to rent and watch with a close girlfriend (i would never watch this with my mother bc the woman cries nonstop during lifetime movies... i could only imagine).
2I am reading the book and once I finish I will see the movie.
3I agree with you ddene5712_2 I hate watching sad movies in the theater! I cry too easy!
Initially, I was very excited about this movie. I read the book years ago, when it first came out, and I really enjoyed. Ever since I found out that they changed the ending in the movie, I haven't been as excited to see it.
4A little too sad for me but I was surprised at the mention of Greg Laswell! I just downloaded his album 'Three Flights from Alto Nido' off Amazon for $2. I had never heard of him and it was the best $2 I ever spent! It's amazing.
5Is it similar to the book? Didn't you report that they changed the ending?
6I bawled when I read the book; despite that, I loved it and I do hope that they didn't change the ending. I agree, Buzz, about Cameron Diaz not being appropriate for the role. While I haven't seen it (obviously), I pictured someone like Toni Collette in the role. I thought they were going to ruin it when I discovered that Diaz and the then-cast Fanning sisters were going to play the roles because I thought that it would too "Hollywood" the story.
7DCBaxter — Yes, the ending in the movie does differ from the ending in the book. In my personal opinion, I think the way they ended it for the movie is good, and works better for the film than the book's ending would have. I'm not sure how others will feel, though. . . .
8I also find Cameron Diaz shrill...I don't have much interest to see this movie. She is immature (not bubbly or effervescent), who is pushing for roles that aren't right for her or that she isn't ready for.
9I just came back from the film. It was a good movie, I think Cameron was convincing and did a fantastic job. Oh boy everyone was crying in the theater.
10I haven't read the book, how was the ending different?
just to add-Cameron Diaz's crying scenes, man, it was real and genuine. I can't imagine anyone saying she did bad (just my opinion!) because I think she perfectly captured what a character like hers would go through with her daughter being sick.
(btw I found out the ending in the book-whoa!)
11Just came back from the theater as well.
Being a Picult religious reader, have to say that the movie is a very well done adaptation and if there is something missing that could had been interesting to see is owed to the limited time not the limitations of the screen writers.
I would had enjoyed to see the Julia-Alex relationship being played out. Yet still not convinced about Baldwin portraying Campbell, in my mind it was someone younger better looking.
Shame the Dakota sisters canceled the roles, however Sofia and Abigail, played beautifully Anna and Kate.
Also, applause for Diaz, she is indeed getting older and these type of roles are adequate now.
12I am so glad that Buzz said what she did about Cameron Diaz - I've been thinking the same thing since I first heard about the casting. I can't stand her, and as a diehard fan of this book I found her casting very insulting to the author. that character has so many layers; and Cameron is not a good enough actor to portray that. I really don't think a movie should have been made at all, considering how much depth the book itself has; way too much to be captured on screen...
13I loved this book and will not see the movie because I don't want to risk ruining what I read and have pictured in my mind.
14I read the book a few years ago which led to a deep respect for Jodi Piccoult as an author. I am deeply disappointed the screenwriters did not use the ending as written in the book. I thought the movie had great parts but not as good as it could have been. I also thought Cameron Diaz missed it and was too shallow for the part. The rest of the cast were great. As a mom who has lost a child to leukemia the movie brought back some painful and poignant memories. The hospice worker was awful and not true at all to how hospice works. The doctor suggesting parents engineer a new child to help a child with cancer would be thrown out of the profession for unethical behavior. This topic is very controversial and difficult for parents of children with cancer and Jodi Piccoult did a fabulous job of covering it in her book. I can only say again the movie ending was sooo disappointing.
15I went to see it yesterday and it was really sad!
16I saw it yesterday by myself and cried with the rest of the audiences. I read the book a few months ago with the Buzz Book Club. I agree with Buzz Sugar that the ending change worked for the movie. It's a tough job to tell the story from multiple character's voices as the way the book did, but I thought the film did a good job. And I'm very glad that they cut the Julia-Alex story out as I didn't care so much for it in the book. I would highly recommend reading the book even if you have seen the movie. Have a large box of tissue next to you!
17I saw this movie on Friday and I have never been so mad at a movie in my life. If I would have known that they were going to change the ending I wouldnt have seen it...SOOOO MAD!! Who does that??
18"My Sister's Keeper" is one of my fave books, unfortunately I am not looking forward to seeing it portrayed in a film with certain characters cast the way they are...Cameron Diaz as Sara? What are you freaking thinking, she is a great, lively, at times funny actress... which is not anything like Sara in the novel. And, key portions of the book have been deleted from the on-screen story, not to mention that the ENDING IS CHANGED COMPLETELY! I'm disappointed and not sure if I want to even see the film, maybe I will just reread the novel!
19Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.