
One of the announcements that caught my eye from this year's Macworld event was the change in how much iTunes music downloads will cost. Starting in April, songs will cost either $0.69, $0.99, or $1.29. So far, Apple's just said the songs will be priced according to what labels charge them. But there's one theory going around that the $1.29 price will apply to "the handful of the most sought-after songs," which drive the majority of iTunes sales in the first place.
On the one hand, I don't mind paying $1.29 for "Single Ladies" if it means I can download more obscure stuff for less. But on the other hand, couldn't the most popular songs be cheaper because more people will be buying them? And what happens when last year's big single isn't so popular anymore — is it $1.29 forever?
So many questions, but let's start with the basic one: Is it a good idea to charge more for popular songs?
I just think it's ridiculous that they want to charge
more when a lot of people just download music for free. The only reason I use itunes 99 percent of the time is because it has better quality but I'll probably just buy real CDs instead if the
prices keep going up.














one of the reasons that i got to iTunes vs physical stores is that i know that i'm getting a decent price for just the one song rather than paying a premium. there are other outlets that we can get music that it just doesn't make sense to me that they would feel the need to charge more. i wonder what type of impact this will have for apple.
1