Love for the sake of love is a story as old as the hills, but I couldn't help wondering if it might be a bit misplaced in our modern times as I watched the screen adaptation of Stephenie Meyer's popular young adult novel Twilight. In this story's world, if you're the first girl the gorgeous, brooding guy across the cafeteria is suddenly interested in, you've accomplished something worth celebrating. You should not ask why, and you should return his desire for you with a devotion so intense you're even willing to risk death. It's all very dramatic and smacks of an old-fashioned tale of romance and danger. But rather than seeming antiquated, this kind of earnest, obsessive love story manages to be more or less universal enough for today's savvy audiences.

Director Catherine Hardwicke (who knows from movies about teens, having directed Thirteen) smartly casts her leads with talented young actors (Kristen Stewart as the mortal teenager Bella Swan and Rob Pattinson effortlessly playing the self-loathing vampire, Edward Cullen) and centers her film on the slow, boiling passion that builds between them. However, Hardwicke is woefully negligent when it comes to special effects and seems hindered here by a tiny budget. In Meyer's books, the intensity of Edward and Bella's love for each other is matched by the amount of danger that one or both are in due to the vampire stuff. In this movie, the love soars while the supernatural intrigue never gets off the ground, and action sequences land with a hard, laughable thud, making for a somewhat schizophrenic viewing experience. To see what I mean, read more.
After her mother remarries Bella leaves sunny Arizona for a soggy, tiny, town in the Northwest. Bella's a sullen, shy girl, but that doesn't put off the local teens at her new high school who bounce around her like excitable puppies. The boys want to date her, the girls befriend her — it's an easy transition overall. On her first day, Bella notices the Cullen brood enter the building in slow motion while her new friend Jessica explains that they are a mysterious family who only ever hang out with each other. Bella can't help but be transfixed by the show stopper of the bunch: Edward (Judging by the frantic, high-pitched screaming of the youngsters in my screening you may want to bring your earplugs for this scene with Pattinson's entrance). Ultimately, Bella catches on to Edward's secrets, which only make her want to get closer to him. He relents, admitting that the scent of her blood is "like heroin" to him. After revealing the whole truth about his family, he tries to make clear to her that they're loathsome creatures doing the best they can to be good (not kill people), and hunt animals instead.
I'm thankful they dispensed with the book's incessant worship of Edward's physical appearance (no need for that anyway, as Rob radiates a heartthrob-y charisma). I just wish there was a bit more explanation as to why Bella is willing to cross over into the dangerous and uncharted territory of canoodling with the undead. Despite all that, I like the movie's Bella better than the book's Bella. Stewart infuses the young woman with an inner strength and gravitas that makes her more of a likable tomboy rather than a helpless teen with low self-esteem. Even quite seriously hindered by funny pasty make-up, Pattinson makes his Edward far less bossy and overbearing than the book's, and has more of a "misunderstood bad boy" vibe going.

For the uninitiated, there's a lot that goes unexplained. For example, one of Edward's "brothers," Jasper, looks like he's perpetually enduring an enema which caused laughter from the audience each time he was on screen because we all knew he has a harder time than most resisting eating people. If you haven't read the book, you'll just laugh at this ridiculously stiff, stunned-looking actor. But there are moments in the movie, like when Bella and Edward are lying in a field together, where the visuals are so lovely and the look of it so lush, it's impossible not to get a little swept away in the transcendence of young love, whether you've read the book or not.
But for every little moment in the movie that gives it some universal charm, there's something hilariously, well, bad that happens. Like a cheesy flashback. Or crazy bad special effects. Or laugh-out-loud pasty makeup. Still, it's clear the filmmakers did what they could with the source material being what it is and the budget they had. The truth of the matter is it's a fun — sometimes funny, sometimes stirring — ride and at the end of the day, I was entertained. It may baffle some but fans most likely won't be disappointed.
Photos courtesy of Summit Entertainment




Lanvin
Paul & Joe
Bric's
Like it was going to be cinematical gold? the book stunk and was cheesy so the movie will be, Millions of fans will see it because they buy the cheese.
1I wasn't expecting it to have amazing special effects. I am there for the story. I still cannot wait to see it.
2It knew this wasnt going to be as good as everyone hoped. Books to movies hardly ever are.
3I was afraid that the movie wouldn't meet my high expectations, and I must admit that some of my favorite parts of the book didn't turn up in the movie (when Bella faints cause of blood typing in Bio class, Edward creating a traffic jam so Tyler can ask Bella out, etc..)and that disappointed me a lil. But overall I was pleased, even my boyfriend (who never read the book) found the plot engaging and thought the movie was entertaining! Loved the cameo from Stephenie Meyer (did anybody else catch that??)
4I honestly don't think "supernatural intrigue" was the focal point of Meyer's books at all...I think the amazing love story between Edward and Bella is the real center of the story. And to me, the movie did an amazing job of portraying that. Maybe the danger they were in didn't reach the same intensity as the book, but I still felt it quite a bit when James was tracking Bella.
And special effects?? That is hardly something I cared about while watching this movie...I don't think it needed anything more than what it had. The pasty makeup didn't bother me on Edward...I really think Robert Pattinson made the perfect Edward. I wasn't sure at first, but wow, he was really believable in the role. Bella was perfect to me--exactly how I imagined and visualized her in the books.
I agree with you about Jasper though! I couldn't help but laugh every time he appeared on screen--he kept reminding me of Edward Scissorhands.
Overall, I think that if you're not a die-hard fan of the books, or if you haven't even read the books, you aren't going to appreciate the movie as much. And I agree with Briandiesel that the movie version of a book is never as good, and I didn't like the Twilight movie as much as the book, but I still thought it was a pretty damn good screen adaptation of it.
5Litty0305, I was bummed they didn't do the blood-typing scene either!!! I kept waiting for it.
And yes, I noticed Stephenie's cameo in the diner right away...I knew she was going to appear in in, but I wasn't sure when she'd turn up.
6well you get what you pay for i guess. i still think that it'll do well this weekend since there's a cult following for things like that.
7I enjoyed it.
I was waiting for the blood typing scene too and was disappointed not to see it. I'd much rather have that than the field trip.
Was I the only one that thought him sparkling in the sun looked like sweat?
Oh yeah...emalove, my sister said he looked like Edward Scissorhands too.
I missed some stuff because of the oohs and awws, so I'll probably go again in a couple of weeks.
8I agree that this movie is definately for true fans of the book. Of course movies will never be as good as the book, there is just too much story to tell. However, it was entertaining to watch these characters that existed only in my mind as I read, come to life. I'm thankful that I enjoyed it as much as I did, both the books and the movie. Not everyone has the kind of mind that allows them to take a journey to another place and imagine beautiful things and fairytale love stories that real life experiences can hardly compare to.
9Oh my goodness. My sisters and I went to the midnight showing. It was horribly campy. It was over the top. But some moments were touching. Meyerpire-lore stresses that their appearance doesn't change from when they're dying, and Edward had stubble in about 3/4 of the scenes, and not in the other 1/4. They cast people so old that it was hard to believe that they "have to be in high school." There wasn't NEARLY enough Alice for me. And overall, it was an enjoyable movie. Cinematic gold? That was never my expectation. An emotionally abusive love story with some delightfully nuts characters? This movie delivered, and I thought it was great at what it tried to be.
10Carlisle's makeup was SO BAD. Haha. I think Kristen ended up looking more fair-skinned than the vampires in most scenes... their faces were just chalky. I sympathize with the makeup artists, though, because trying to make Nikki Reed look ghostly pale cannot have been an easy task. I barely recognized her.
11I was a little disappointed, but nethertheless still infatuated with Edward. His passion for her was the closest thing to believable than everything else.
12I went and saw it at midnight also, and I loved it. While I too was a little disapoointed not to see some of my favorite scenes from the book (blood typing, the three guys all asking Bella to the dance, the meadow scene did not deliver like it did in the book); there were some wonderful parts and I laughed, cried, sighed, and dreamt of Edward after I got home (for the two hours I got to sleep before work this morning anyway)! I also missed her cooking for her Dad, and was dying to hear Edward tell her she talks in her sleep.
13I thought it was hilarious when Edward caught her scent in the classroom, I loved the reactions the first time he took her home to meet his family, and while she was still hilariously clumsly, it was not overdone like the book tends to do. But, despite some early reservations, I loved, Loved, LOVED Rob Pattison as Edward! I thought he was so good and so hot, though his chest totally needed a waxing, hello, "smooth marble"! The rest of the cast was hit and miss for me: I really wanted more screen time of all of them. Billy Burke was pretty good as Charlie (that gun scene and the pepperspray stuff had me rolling!)
Of course, I would have been happy to sit and watch ten hours with all four books being depicted, so I understand that they had to leave some stuff out to keep it to a normal movie time. Overall, I loved it, I will proabbly go see it at least once more and will definitely be buying it on DVD. Hopefully the numbers for this weekend are good and we will get more movies (I really want the fourth book to be made soo soo bad!) If it does what last night seemed to indicate they better not only greenlight all four movies, but better up the budget because the next movie is going to need some serious speical effects (werewolves and Volturi). Oh, and Jasper totally looked like Edward Scissorhands!!!
Yeah, saw this movie blowing from the start:) Definitely wasn't going to be a wonderful film played out b/c of the storyline...it either had to be filled with fantasy or just completely changed from the book. While I love the books (and am reading New Moon right now after finishing Twilight about a month ago) it just doesn't scream great movie to me. I think her devotion to Edward is very childlike anyways so the thought of seeing that in live action just didn't move me.
14i enjoyed the books, they were an entertaining read. and from the trailers, i had a feeling the movie was definitely not going to live up to it. it was choppy, skipped around a lot, and cut too many parts. i went with a friend who had no background, and she just found a lot of the parts that were supposed to be sincere and tender kinda comical. i hope that with a bigger budget, and BETTER DIRECTION, they'll do better with the next movies.
15I love the people who get all worked up over a not so good review. This movie looked pretty awful from the start. The book is good but the movie is cheesy.
16Haha saw the midnight showing and I laughed my ass off for the first 45 minutes ... Buzz great call out about Jasper, we all thought he looked like that!! OMG terrible movie adaptation and unfort I have to go again with other friends in 2 hours ... ugh thank god Edward is hot, that's the only saving grace!
17White makeup on skin is NEVER going to look good- I mean, thats just how it is- haha
18I have just purchased the first book in this series, because I want to see the movie, but from what everyone is saying, if you JUST see the movie you'll be disappointed and then won't want to read the books. So, I'm reading. LOL
I got hooked on the Harry Potter series because of the first movie being so well done (even though it cut out a LOT, they did a great job with it still). I was thinking twilight would be that way too, but after reading early reviews, I figured I better read the book first. So, I'm off on the adventure. LOL
Plus, it's based in Washington. What more reason did I need?
19I've read the book. It was contrived and annoying, but at least people can say that the film was true to the book.
Lousy book = Lousy Movie.
And those Twilight girls need to back off-- the HP fans had R.Pattz first, ladies!
20I must be easy to please because I really liked the movie.
I went in knowing that
it wouldn't be as good as the book....movies made from books never are. Considering the low budget and having to turn a 500 page book into a 2 hour movie, I thought they did a decent job.
21I haven't seen it yet but I will be seeing it this weekend. My expectations aren't too high because this movie had SUCH a small budget. TINY. Also, movies are rarely (never?) as good as the book.
So, hopefully they will make the second movie and this time have a MUCH larger budget. I'd like to see what they'd accomplish with more money.
22i went to the midnight showing with my boyfriend, i LOVED it! yes i laughed a lot during the movie but it was mainly due to excitement to see the book acted out!! i just loved it! i will need to watch it again when the excitment dies down and viewers stop screaming every time a new character comes on the scene.
my boyfriend liked it too altho i had to do a LOT of convincing and pleading to get him to go. he loved the baseball scene! i thought alice looked AWESOME!
23I just had a feeeling this movie would bomb. They were in promotion overdrive for Twilight and in my opinion, when a movie is practically forced down our throats they way Twilight was, it was kinda doomed to fail.
24Good, now I just hope the Twilight mania disappears for awhile. I'm sick of seeimg them on every damn blog I visit. JMHO
K is for Kait is absolutely right! If it hadn't been for Lord Voldemort killing him in the first place he'd never have become a vampire! :stubborn:
25As I fan, i am definitely satisfied. I could never expect it to be as great as the book, but they did great with what they had. I thought Robert and Kristen were great, especially in the bio lab part. Also, did anyone else realize how funny the beginning was? i thought that was a nice touch, even though there were several people who laughed thinking Edward's pained looks were overdramatic. The true fans know how perfect that look was.
26I found the book was way too pretentious and highly formulated... I laughed at the dialogue, plot and characters the whole time... I do think that I might at least like the movie because I'm more tolerant of bad movies than books.
27Could anyone give me a heads up about what makes it pg-13? My daughter who is almost 12 wants to see it and she has read books 1 & 2 and I was curious as to what the PG-13 rating was for....violence or sex stuff (hopefully not)
28I will be going with her if we see it and I read book one. Just curious about the rating.
29I agree with CaterpillarGirl and K is for Kait, and totally agree with Black Velveteen. The book really did stink. And the excessive promotion for this movie is unbearable!
I'm SICK of people saying Twilight's budget was small! The budget was $37 million, and incredible movies that would have benefited from a larger effects budget have been made for far less.
30I'm not surprised that the hardcore Twilight fans still love the movie
Buzz was just being
objective...that's her job. But I'm not surprised that the special effects and action scenes sucked because 1.) the budget was very low since Summit Entertainment is a new studio (2.) there
is barely any action scenes in the book, so they probably had to improvise a bit.
I didn't enjoy the books as much as some people, but I'm still planning on seeing the movie and going in with an open mind even though that scene I've seen a thousand times on TV is extremely cheesy (Edward: Say it. Bella: Vampire...ugh).
Mykie - Don't set your expectations too high, Twilight is nowhere near as good as Harry Potter unless you like mindless romance novels. I'm not saying it's terrible, it's just not as good as HP and I'm sick of hearing the comparison between the two (not from you, from other people
)
31I loved the books, especially Twilight, and was very excited to see this film but i ended up being disappointed. The cast was great but other than that, nothing else seemed to fall into place. I didn't hate it but I didn't love it either that's for sure
32I just saw this and thought it was TERRIBLE, it was really boring and the editing is bad.
33i just saw it and thought it was ok. it was not really great but it wasnt that bad either. it was more of a comedy movie at some parts and bella and edwards relationship felt a little too rushed. There were some really cute moments and the baseball scene was amazing!
34i love the book but i was a little disappointed in the lack of scenes/details that were either changed or omitted. i know they can't include it all, but this could have created more interest to those who haven't read the book. therefore, i agree with buzz in that i found the audience laughing at inside jokes throughout the movie such as why jasper always looked pained in most scenes.
i felt they could have built the intensity of feelings between bella and edward a little more. they also could have included more with edward's mind reading which i always thought was interesting and often humorous throughout the series. i also felt the supernatural aspects were lacking power so with that said i hope twilight makes enough money for some really good sequels. overall though i am pleased with the movie. i knew it could never truly measure up to the book.
35It was terrible, please! It could of been worse, still, but the movie was cheesy, and the acting was terrible. The scenes were odd and seemed cut-off. The movie didn't flow the right way. It could have been so much better. At points that were suppose to be serious, the audience in the theater and I laughed. Edward Cullen in the movie was unbelievably awkward and it could have been so much better. I love the setting though, that's one thing that I'll give, but other then that, the movie was terrible.
36I'm usually a person who loves cheesy romances because I want some fluff in my life. But when I tried reading Twilight, it just didn't work for me, since I found myself so at odds with the narrator, Bella. Still, I had planned to see the movie with friends, but thus far, I've heard nothing but bad things about it. Bad editing, bad acting, just bad overall. Not so sure I want to pay up to see this movie now...Bolt is much more appealing.
37Ijust left the movies right now.. And by far this movie was outstanding. It was funny,romantic and fantastic..robert looks so handsome in this movie. Kristen is extremely clumsy in the movie its funny. And my two favorite parts were the prom when he lift her to dance and when she walks into bio and he catches her scent he looks like if he is about to vomit.. Too funny people go watch it! My boytoy loved it and he is not into all that scfi stuff!!! Going to watch the film again forsure
38And the ones that only comment to bash the film and never even read the book it shows that you have no imagination, fantasies or desires...
39And the ones that only comment to bash the film and never even read the book it shows that you have no imagination, fantasies or desires...
40I had plenty of gripes with the film, but the special effects weren't one of them. I don't think they were noticeably bad at all.
And last time I checked $37 million isn't exactly chump change, especially when you've got no big stars....just saying. It's definitely not a "small budget" film by any means.
41i haven't seen it yet!
(((
42Anyway to fully understand the movie you definitely have to read the book cos movies never do books justice.
and from all the spoilers i've already seen, i know i'm not going to love it THAT much.
But i still NEED to watch it.
yadiet, I haven't seen one person who has bashed the books who has said that they never read it. I have read it and I didn't like it as much as some of you, that doesn't mean I "lack imagination." It just means that my reading level is higher than that of a high school freshman (ok sorry, that was a little mean but honestly the writing stlye makes it seem like the author was a high school freshman when she wrote it...the romantic storyline is alright, but I prefer Jane Eyre).
43part of why vampires are so appealing to moviegoers who love vampire lit is that they are so much cooler than humans. twilight's are especially interesting with their powers or ablilites. so much more could have been done with this to create more interest for those who haven't read the book. for example, they could have at least mentioned what made jasper special rather than just having him walk around with a tortured expression which only readers understood the reason behind it.
44Awful awful awful. The director of photography should be ashamed. They tried so hard to make it look like an edgy teen movie with the hand held camera work, the weird camera angles, too many closeups and almost flat out refusing to put edward and bella in the same frame at the same time. Everytime one of them said something it moved to a closeup of their faces. LET THEM LOOK AT EACH OTHER AND LET ME SEE THEM BOTH REACT FOR GOODNESS SAKES! They couldn't get out of their own way long enough to let the story tell itself. I like the actors, especially Bella, but they were way over directed and it was so heavy handed. I will say there were moments that I saw where the movie could have been really good but overall it was a mess.
45I haven't seen the movie yet, but since the book was so awful, I have absolutely no expectations that it could be very good. Besides bad writing, the book is so lost in a fanatical world of morality that in it's attempt at realism, it looses reality all together. I am not okay with the message it sends implying that sex before marriage is worse than death, and Bella is a horrible example of a heroine for teenage girls to look up to.
It makes me wish the Harry Potter craze was back.
I'm not trying to offend the people who love the book, but the book deeply offended me.
46I don't know what movie you guys watched, but in the version I saw they completely explained why Jasper had such an expression on his face- my boyfriend's never read the book and he totally understood.
47Thank you Phasekitty for acknowledging that the budget for Twilight was not so meek. How asinine it is to consider a movie low budget with $37 mil. Two and a half Pan's Labyrinths (made for $14.5 million) could have been made with one Twilight.
Thank you Californiagirlx7, I read up to chapter thirteen and frustratingly decided that I would rather spend my time reading more elegant writer. I picked up Jonathan Coe's The House of Sleep and haven't looked back since. Life is too short to waste on poor prose!
It's fascinating seeing people's reactions to the movie. While it's great that some people enjoyed it, it's also comforting to know that many who haven't read the book (or, in it's entirety) were lukewarm or appalled by it. Many claim the movie was made for the fans and thus the fans will be the ones who can truly appreciate it. But, isn't that made moot with a budget of $37 million? Doesn't that kind of large investment in a motion picture imply that the movie is meant to appeal to a wider audience than Stephenie Meyer's reader base?
48Well said Phil.
49not as good as the book obviously. But after seeing it the second time i actually cried.
50Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.