The conflicted and heroic history of World War II's Buffalo Soldiers deserves to be told in a dramatic and thoughtful movie. Unfortunately, Miracle at St. Anna is neither of those things. After seeing the subtle trailer, I was curious how Spike Lee's style would translate into a war epic, but I never imagined this. The overdone melodrama is so weighed down with trivial details that it loses the potentially powerful impact of its subject matter.

With Miracle at St. Anna, Lee sets out to correct that fact that black soldiers have been largely absent from WWII cinema and memory. To that end, the story follows four members of the 92nd Infantry Division, comprised of 15,000 African-American troops. After a devastating battle on the Italian frontlines, the surviving foursome — Stamps (Derek Luke), Bishop (Michael Ealy), Hector (Laz Alonso), and Train (Omar Benson Miller) — are left to fend for themselves with a broken radio and an injured Italian kid they've picked up along the way. For what goes wrong, read more.
Lee capably conveys the neglect the soldiers suffer at the hands of their white commanders, and you feel the ache of these heroes fighting for a country so dismissive of them. Especially powerful is a battlefield scene in which the Buffalo Soldiers are forced to listen to the bewitching voice of "Axis Sally" (Germany's version of Tokyo Rose) promising racial equality, good food, and beautiful women if they surrender. Unfortunately, most of the movie is sorely lacking the emotional weight it deserves.

As ambitious as Miracle is in concept, it's amateurish in execution and often insulting to moviegoers' intelligence. The war story is bookended by a modern-day mystery: One of our vets is accused of murder, and cops find an ancient Italian artifact in his closet. The story isn't revisited until the final scene of the unnecessarily long 160-minute movie, at which point the "mystery" is solved in a way that viewers will see coming from miles away. (But just in case we don't, the characters spell it all out in laughably explanatory dialogue.)

Throughout the movie, the dramatic tension is deflated by a melodramatic musical score and heavy-handed script by James McBride, who wrote the novel on which the film is based. Frequently, the characters deliver lines that clumsily explain plot points or, even worse, elaborate on the cultural commentary that should be intrinsic. Miracle at St. Anna is also plagued by several scenes that just defy logic. For instance, if the Italian boy understands the word "no" and knows that nodding means "yes," why must he and Train communicate through a system of taps, where one tap means "yes" and two taps mean "no"? Because it figures into the plot later, of course!
When the mystery borders on farce, overexaggerated performances by Ealy and Miller don't do it any favors. But I was impressed by Luke as the level-headed Stamps and Alonso in the multilayered role of Hector; both manage to convey gravitas in a movie that's lacking it. But frankly, I expected more from Spike Lee.
Photos courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures



















Firetrap
Bi La Li
Ed Hardy
Wow. Thanks for this, Buzz! I was intrigued by the trailer but suspected the film might not be as good as it appeared, but I was still going to check it out in theaters. Not any more!! Thanks for saving me and my fiance $20!
1Not really shocking after those scathing reviews I have read!
2Thanks for saving me from this. I had seen the trailer and it looked pretty good. This kind of movie is hard to pull off. Not the usual Spike Lee fare, but some directors--Woody Allen for example--do well in different genres. Maybe Spike needs to try again.
3it's interesting that you said this since i've seen commercials for the movie and i've wanted to like it but i can't get into it. my fiance and i were just talking about what movie we were going to see this weekend and he mentioned that everyone's talking about how this is the greatest movie that spike lee's done, and yet i don't see it...and your review confirms that for me.
4I just got back from the movie, and though i see your point.. the movie was great. If you want to see a different side of war, a black side of war then this a movie that you should go see. Yes, this is not Spike Lee's genre, but he does the best he can and the movie is good. It's not GREAT but it's good. Give it a chance.
Honestly, I'm just glad that Spike Lee is showcasing new, young, black actors. Denzel can't be in everything! And these actors did a GREAT job.. a really GREAT job. I was moved.
5I'm pissed. I've been really looking forward to this for months. Just read Ebert's review and he gave it 3/4, saying basically the same things. Ugh. I still want to see it for myself, though.
6I actually wanted to look into this movie, it looked good! I wasn't sure though because the trailer on tv didn't make as much sense as the trailers you can find online.
7Quite disappointing actually since it looked like a promising movie.
sad that this movie has gotten such bad reviews. i really wanted to see it and now i'm not sure if i will. maybe on a rainy day....
8I heard a review of this yesterday that was pretty brutal. I find it surprising, since Spike Lee usually makes good movies.
9The trailer looked good, I'm a little disappointed the reviews say it's not worth it.
10personally I don't judge the movie I'm going to see based on reviews. having said that I read one that gave the movie 3.5 stars out of 4 and another that gave it 2 stars out of 4.
I saw the movie yesterday and I enjoyed it. I wasn't crazy about the way it ended, but I thought Spike did a good job. the actors were good as well. I've recommended my family and friends to go see it.
bottom line people will have their own opinion any way you slice it.
11I completely disagree with all or most of what has been stated in the postings about Spike Lee's film.
I agree that there are various intricacies in plot and character development/character motivation elements that are not ironed out exactly how most movie-viewers would like. Nevertheless, the problem with most film-goers is that they expect films to be like others...to have typical, circular plots, predictability...and this movie was exactly the opposite and that's what makes it pretty phenomenal. The fact that it had some odd bits and pieces left for some intrigue to the viewer for exactly that, to discuss and stimulate thought well-after the film. Not everything has to be tied into one neat little package...Americans, we are so lazy, even when it comes to watching films. I think it was brilliant that he called the film Miracle at St. Anna...clearly, the boy was symbolic of hope, which is the miracle.
I have to say that I am not an avid Spike Lee fan, some stuff I get, some stuff is so cliche, it hurts. However, this was totally unexpected not only for him, but in regards to the genre in general...it was not your typical WWII movie and it wasn't laden with "OMG, we're so oppressed, white people suck"...although there was a little of that (I disagree that this was about the "black side of war" at all)...the movie was about the struggle of prejudice and racism as interpreted and felt within the spectrum of the black soldiers...it paralleled the struggle of prejudice/racism between facists and partisans and their plight...this was brilliant!
I hope you consider my thoughts here and ty for posting.
12To diamond...in my opinion, it is one of his best films, if not THE BEST!
13I agree with delta and diva.....Its a good movie....You guys should go and see it.
14Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.