The sci-fi "thriller" Jumper can be described in one word: empty. Pretty much everything about this movie is devoid of any real energy, passion or substance. The performances are stale and lifeless, the plot is interesting in theory but fails in execution and the visuals aren't cool enough to keep us engaged. The plot is boringly similar to that of Heroes (which is itself like a clone of X-Men), and yet Heroes is so much more enjoyable. At least Heroes features intriguing characters who might band together for a higher purpose. Lacking both good characters and any kind of higher purpose, Jumper just lays there.

Here's the plot: David (Christensen) is a "Jumper," someone who can teleport himself. The Jumpers of the world are at odds with the Paladins, and one Paladin in particular, Roland (Samuel L. Jackson) is on a mission to rid the world of all Jumpers everywhere. In his pursuit, he has no problem killing all of the jumpers' loved ones. Hence, David's lady friend Millie (Rachel Bilson) is in danger, and David must protect her as well as elude Roland's grasp. That's it for the story, but for more of my thoughts on the film, read more.
In a seriously empty movie, the emptiest part is Hayden Christensen on whom I think we'd be hard-pressed to find a pulse. He must have been stoked to get this part that requires so little of him because this way he can be comatose onscreen and people are left to wonder if it's the actor or the material. I suspect it's a little bit of both, though Christensen definitely needs to be held accountable for his dismal performance. It angers me that he can't even be bothered to, say, add any kind of inflection to his voice. As though we're the ones wasting his time and not the other way around.

And in tired repetition of an old formula, the main female character is helpless and outrageously stupid and the lone black character is the face of evil. David's mother, played by Diane Lane, is also a hateful character. Christensen makes it impossible for us to care about David, so that leaves one interesting character: David's fellow Jumper Griffin, played with some degree of liveliness by Jamie Bell. When the audience is longing to find out more about this secondary character to the point of being annoyed with the protagonists for getting in the way of his story, there's a problem. Unless your eyes need some exercise in rolling, I think it's best you jump away from this movie.
For exclusive videos about Jumper — including a preview video — check out movies.ivillage.com.
Photos courtesy of 20th Century Fox



















Burberry
Buti
Karen Millen
Ouch. So harsh. I had high hopes for this movie, too!
1I am bummed to hear that this film saw such a dud. Jamie Bell is such a great actor so I am sad to see he is once again being wasted in a film.
2*edit* was such a dud NOT saw. oops.
3That was way harsh Tai! Definitely, Maybe it is.
4Wow. That stinks. I had high hopes for this one too. But really just for Samuel L. Jackson. I can watch him in almost anything.
5Wow. And my husband wanted to see this one. No thanks now!
6That sucks, but i'm still gonna see it. Hayden rocks!
7Definitely plan to miss this one. Thanks for the honest review, Buzz.
8I'm not surprised. I think Hayden Christiensen's success is a joke; I've never seen him NOT be horribly wooden in anything.
As a matter of fact, thinking about him makes me angry.
9I could tell from the previews that this was going to be a terrible movie. Thanks for confirming my suspicions, Buzz. Hayden Christiansen, though pretty, is a terrible actor. And the whole story looks ridiculous, too.
10"Unless your eyes need some exercise in rolling, I think it's best you jump away from this movie."
L0L
I didn't plan on seeing this anyway...
11Has Molly seen this review?
12I have and its all very
. I'll still see it with an open mind (and secretly maybe even still
find a way to enjoy it), but sadly I'm thinking that this may not be the movie that makes Bilson a movie star. Sigh, maybe next time.
13pretty harsh buzz... : (
14So disappointing! I was really excited about seeing this movie over the weekend...
Oh well, I
guess I will stick with the romantic comedy for this weekend (Definitely, Maybe) and try for action next weekend with Vantage Point.
15Mmmm that's disappointing. I thought the previews looked really promising too!
16The boyfriend is so excited about this movie, and it is his birthday... hope he is not too disappointed.
17I didn't think this looked very good, but it's good to know my suspicions were right
18kinda not shocked.... but jamie bell is so gorg!
19we were going to see it today but something came up & we couldn't go :/ thank god for that, lol. thanks for the review.
20Interesting review, I'll wait until it comes out on video then. I've got to catch up on my homework this weekend anyway.
21You mean you guys DONT like something Rachel has anything to do with?! Shocker!
22wow, that sucks. i was excited for this one.
23Even though I
Hayden, I've always sort of thought his acting skillz were lackluster. I
pretty much figured this would be a wait-for-the-dvd sort of movie anyway, thanks for the review!
24omg i was going to see this movie too! now i'm definitely going to pass on it
25I really want to see this movie even though I've heard it isn't good.
26
Love this review!
27I'm not surprised really, I only wanted to see it because it's got Jamie, Hayden and Samuel. But when the only good actors have vaguely smaller parts and you have Rachel Bilson and Hayden Christensen as leading actors you can't really expect much, can you?
Dang. I wanted to watch it too. Thanks Buzz!
28wow, what a shock. this movie that looked totally crappy from the trailer IS totally crappy.
29I think this was just a bit too harsh and unneeded. I mean we must remember that this is just ONE person's opinion on a blog.
I think I'll still see this movie with an open mind too. Hayden is a pretty good actor, so it may be the script that was crappy. But again, I think I will judge this movie after I see it for myself. This is only the opinion of one person so far. The movie just came out yesterday.
30Too bad. The book that I think it's based on is supposed to be great...
31I just saw this film last evening, and I didn't think it was that bad. The worst bit of it was with Samuel L Jackson, and his co-workers trying somehow to get rid of jumpers.
It was a hell of a lot better than Definately, Maybe which was definately rubbish!
32Stephen king loved the movie!!
I saw a great movie last week called Jumper …
http://www.stephenking.com/
33well that's disappointing to hear. i LOVE rachel and samuel! i'll have to see it anyway..
34I saw it last night- it wasn't that bad. It was entertaining and that's the reason why i go to the movies in the first place. And I wouldn't exactly call Rachel Bilson a "lead" actor in the movie either. She didn't have that big of a part.
35It sucks. I'd advise to wait for video to watch this one or even TV.
36Seriously, there are way better movies out there to spend money on.
It sucks. I'd advise to wait for video to watch this one or even TV.
37Seriously, there are way better movies out there to spend money on.
This movie would make a terrific drinking game. Every time they jump, you take a sip. By the end, you won't even remember what the movie is called, let alone the storyline.
And Hayden Christensen ruined Star Wars (Episodes 2&3). Soooo yeah, not really a big fan. He's pretty, though.
38Haha loved this review Buzz, you sounds pretty angry about the film!
I'm a bit disappointed to hear about H. Christensen; as much as I hated him in Star Wars 2 (and I *hated* him), I thought he was really good in Episode 3, especially considering he had to deal with George Lucas' famously terrible dialogues :rolleyes:. Anyway, I was hoping he'd be better than that.
Guess I'll wait for the DVD, now I know the story a bit better, I'm not super excited about paying to see the film.
39I wish I had read this review before I wasted nine dollars on this one. Your review is much too generous. It was downright awful.
40I love this movie
I like Rachel in this movie
41Ha.. Definitely not surprised by the quality of this one. A movie is a sum of its parts!
42PinkNC- "This is just one person's opinion on a blog." Well....true, but it is a movie review! Isn't that what Buzz is supposed to do? We can't get angry with her for giving a bad review, even if someone disagrees with it!
I mean, the movie does look pretty terrible, I would not have been even tempted to see it except that Bilson is in it.
Don't worry Molly, I think a lot of people like Bilson, so hopefully she will get some more chances. I think she's adorable, but I REALLY have a hard time picturing her doing a great job in an interesting movie. Hopefully some genius casting director will figure it out, and she'll get a chance in a decent movie!
43I’m not angry with Buzz. Like I said...it’s just one person’s opinion, and we should see the movie before we believe one person on a blog. Some of the people here have already stated that the movie really wasn’t that bad at all, and they enjoyed it. Again, I will see the movie for myself before I make a final judgment.
44i saw this movie the other night, and i have to agree it's quite "empty". i did think the action and concept was entertaining. But the story line sucks, and the characters dont give the audience a whole lot. AND Racheal B. looks super not so good skinny. its a dud.
45I wanted to see it too--especially with Hayden, Diane, Rachel, and Samuel. Not to mention the "From the people who brought you The Bourne Identity..." promo. I think I'll wait to rent it too.
46don't care about the reviews just care that i saw my favorite actress rachel bilson on the movie !
47this makes me sad. i was really looking forward to seeing this but i don't think i'm going to bother now with all of the bad reviews I've been reading!
48My husband wanted to see it on his birthday Saturday, so we went together. It was entertaining. It's not going to be classic cinema by any stretch of the imagination, but it was a nice piece of fluff- a good popcorn movie.
49This review was generous. What an awful empty movie. I think the idea was good, and the beginning was good... but once it got past young David, and Hayden started "acting" it really was awful. Characters were badly thought out, and Rachel Bilson's character was stupid. I squirmed in my seat wanting it to be over. The marketing people did a good job, because it came in at number one over the weekend... I'm sure they knew it had to be a big open, because once the reviews started, that would be it. ( And this comes from a person who will pretty much sit through any movie...)
50Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.